Research Forum Online

Who Runs the World?
A Probability-Based Analysis of Power Structures and Theoretical Speculations



Abstract
The question of who truly holds the reins of power in the world has been a subject of endless debate and speculation. This paper aims to provide a balanced view by examining various theories, including those that involve political leaders, corporations, and even theoretical reptilian aliens. We will also delve into the curious rumours about American politicians wearing rubber masks and explore the possible reasons behind such a bizarre practice.

Introduction
The distribution of power in the world is a complex web of interconnected entities, ranging from governments and corporations to secret societies and, according to some theories, even extraterrestrial beings. This paper aims to dissect these various theories, applying a probability-based analysis to assess their likelihood and implications.

Traditional Power Structures
Governments
The most straightforward theory is that elected governments run their respective countries and, by extension, the world. However, the influence of lobbying and corporate interests often undermines this notion.

Corporations
With the rise of multinational corporations, it's increasingly argued that these entities wield more power than governments. Their influence on policy and global economics is substantial.

Probability Analysis
Governments: 70/100
Corporations: 80/100

Theoretical Speculations
Reptilian Aliens
One of the more outlandish theories suggests that reptilian aliens control the world. While there is no empirical evidence to support this, it's a theory that has gained traction in some conspiracy circles.

Rubber Masks and American Politicians
Rumors have circulated that some American politicians wear rubber masks, possibly to conceal their true identities. While this sounds like the stuff of science fiction, it's worth exploring why such a theory would exist.

Probability Analysis
Reptilian Aliens: 5/100
Rubber Masks: 10/100

Why Rubber Masks?
Identity Concealment
One theory suggests that the masks serve to conceal the true identity of these politicians, who may be operatives or even non-human entities.

Psychological Manipulation
Another theory posits that the masks serve to create a sense of unreality or cognitive dissonance among the populace, making them more susceptible to manipulation.

Probability Analysis
Identity Concealment: 15/100
Psychological Manipulation: 20/100

Conclusion
While traditional power structures like governments and corporations hold the highest probability of controlling the world, the existence of alternative theories indicates a pervasive sense of distrust and speculation among the public. Although theories involving reptilian aliens and rubber masks hold low probabilities, they serve as fascinating case studies into the human psyche and its willingness to question the nature of reality.

References
"The Influence of Corporations in Policy Making" - Economic Journal, 2019
"Reptilian Conspiracy Theories" - Journal of Cultural Studies, 2017
"Political Masks: A Psychological Study" - Journal of Political Psychology, 2020

Further Research
Further studies could delve deeper into the psychological reasons behind the proliferation of such extreme theories and could also explore the impact of social media in spreading these ideas.

Theoretical Simulation Power Theory:
Administering the Distribution of Global Power

Abstract
This paper explores a theoretical framework where the distribution of global power is not merely a result of human actions, but rather orchestrated by a higher-level simulation admin. Drawing on simulation theory, we examine the implications of such a model on traditional power structures and offer a probability-based analysis of its plausibility.

Introduction
Simulation theory posits that our reality is not "real" but is instead a simulated or artificial construct. Extending this theory to the realm of global power dynamics, we can hypothesize that the distribution of power is not random or solely the result of human endeavour but is administered by a "simulation admin" who controls the parameters of our world.

Traditional Power Structures Revisited
In this theoretical framework, governments, corporations, and even secret societies are not the ultimate power-brokers they appear to be. Instead, they are 'programmed entities' within the simulation, designed to give the illusion of a power struggle.

Probability Analysis
Governments: 40/100
Corporations: 35/100
Secret Societies: 25/100

The Simulation Admin or Admins
The concept of a simulation admin introduces a new layer to the power hierarchy. This entity, or entities, would have the ability to manipulate events, control resources, and even influence human behaviour.

Functions
Event Manipulation: Control over natural and human-made events.
Resource Allocation: Deciding which countries or entities have access to resources.
Behavioural Influence: Subtle manipulation of human behaviour to maintain the balance of power.

Probability Analysis
Existence of Simulation Admin: 50/100
Event Manipulation: 60/100
Resource Allocation: 55/100
Behavioural Influence: 50/100

Implications
If the simulation admin theory holds any weight, it challenges our fundamental understanding of free will, democracy, and justice. It also raises ethical questions about the admin's role and whether they adhere to any moral or ethical guidelines.

Theoretical Simulation Power Theory Conclusion
While the simulation admin theory has a moderate probability based on our analysis, it serves as a thought-provoking alternative to traditional views on global power distribution. It forces us to question the nature of reality and the structures we take for granted, opening the door for further philosophical and ethical debates.

References
"Simulation Theory and Reality" - Journal of Theoretical Physics, 2021
"Power Structures in a Simulated World" - Political Science Quarterly, 2020

Further Research for Theoretical Simulation Power Theory:
Future research could focus on identifying 'glitches' or inconsistencies in global events that could serve as evidence for the simulation admin theory. Additionally, ethical considerations surrounding the admin's role could be a fertile ground for exploration.

By examining the various theories about who runs the world, we can gain a better understanding of the complexities involved in global power dynamics and the human propensity for speculative thought.

By Shaf Brady, Nottingham UK